Return to list
Resuscitation of Care Act a win for all
June 29, 2012
by Clive McFarlane
cmcfarlane@telegram.com
(c) Worcester Telegram & Gazette
The
nation’s Affordable Care Act is still standing, despite several well-funded
opposition campaigns designed to wipe it off the books and to ensure that the
person held most responsible for its creation, President Barack Obama, would be
a one-term president.
The
latter outcome is still a possibility, but the Supreme Court’s decision
yesterday affirming the central tenet of the law — the mandate that all
Americans who can afford health insurance get it — pretty much means Obamacare,
as the law is commonly called, will be a lot more difficult to uproot.
“I
know there will be a lot of discussion today about the politics of all this,
about who won and who lost. That’s how these things tend to be viewed here in
Washington,” Mr. Obama said in his response to the ruling. “But that discussion
completely misses the point. Whatever the politics, today’s decision was a
victory for people all over this country whose lives will be more secure
because of this law and the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold it.”
That
is not to say the opposition is likely to go away anytime soon.
If
you recall, opponents led by the tea party promoted the now-debunked “death
panels” theory — that the law contained provisions that would allow the
government to counsel some elderly Americans to end their lives rather than
seek expensive medical care.
That
was followed by the claim that the law was a major part of Mr. Obama’s road to
socialism, and although the death panels claim has mostly subsided, the
definition of the law as an organ of socialism is still very strong.
These
lines of attack, along with the allegation that the law will greatly increase
the nation’s debt despite several reports to the contrary by the nonpartisan
Congressional Budget Office, will increase in intensity as we moved toward the
presidential elections in November.
In
the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling, Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican
presidential nominee, was quick to reiterate his pledge to repeal the law if he
wins the presidency, and Sen. Scott Brown noted in a statement that “The
federal health care law may be constitutional, but it is wrong for jobs and the
economy.
“In
Massachusetts, we had already dealt responsibly with the problem of our
uninsured without raising taxes or cutting care to our seniors,” Mr. Brown
said.
Like
most supporters of the law, Sen. John Kerry saw the court’s decision as a vindication
of the enormous political capital the president and Democrats spent in securing
passage of the Affordable Care Act.
“For
the past three years, opponents of health reform did everything they could to
distort and deceive,” he noted in a released statement.
“They
tried to scare the American public with outright lies about ‘death panels’ and
‘socialized medicine.’ When that didn’t work, they came up with a new strategy:
claim that the individual mandate the Republican Party itself had invented was
unconstitutional. Today, the conservative Roberts Court put an end to that
debate.
While
it would seem reckless and irresponsible for Congress to now scrap the law and
take us back to the unsustainable status quo and pre-law health care climate,
that is still a real possibility and that is why the Obama administration can
ill-afford to relax now.
Indeed,
having made the mistake of allowing opponents to define the particulars of the
law following its historic passage, Mr. Obama and his supporters should now use
the court’s constitutional print of approval to clearly spell out for Americans
what the law really does.
Frances
M. Anthes, president and CEO of the Family Health Center of Worcester, is among
those hoping supporters will do a better job in shaping the debate on what the
law is this time around.
Ms.
Anthes noted how the Massachusetts health reform law, on which the Affordable
Care Act is largely fashioned, has put this state far ahead of others in the
country in offering health care to a majority of its residents.
In
addition to covering millions of Americans who are currently uninsured, the
Affordable Care Act, she noted, contains provisions that provide free
preventive care, allow young people to stay on their parents’ health insurance
until they turn 26 years old, stop insurance companies from denying health care
to individuals with pre-existing health conditions, and from dumping
individuals who have maxed-out their coverage.
“I
believe health care is a right, not a privilege and we owe it to ourselves to
take care of each other,” she said. “It is a major reiteration of the major
principles in which we believe in this country.”
2012 News